Stephen Foord Books & Music
Fair Science and Fair Theology
Launched in new Books

The top pictures are of the Happisburgh (‘Hazebro‘ to locals) lighthouse and its neighbouring St. Mary’s church. They are endangered by coastal erosion as picture on the music page illustrates. Both are institutions said to offer a guiding light to society. The sea is a metaphor for the wicked in scriptures. A site-theme may then be those in peril on the material and spiritual seas.


View Stephen Foord's profile on LinkedIn

Introducing Fair Science and Theology

Book 1 proposes negligence law as a foundation for both fair science and fair theology. The finding benefits all fair minded life but especially strategic groups of fair Jews and LGBT life by allowing fair trials on reality to establish their right to exist against selfish prejudice or hate crime. To find rights theology exists for human rights may surprise or upset some today. It fully ruins natural cosmology as like an infinitely unlikely alibi for negligent research in court.

Rights theology is only possible in a bilateral spiritual reality. Spiritual awareness of key groups that threaten to bring fair trials for rights to ruin evolutionary cosmology and theology may explain homophobia and ant-Semitism. A fair analysis shows rights theology a likely explanation for success of LGBT life compared to that LGBT life is an evolutionary success in natural cosmology. The due process trial to confirm that leads to see how a fair Judgement Day can be more likely than a natural end to our life, see back covers for book 2 and book 1 on this site. As a result natural cosmology is negligent hate crime for courts. This is to be open knowledge for interested parties before the Day.

Spiritual inheritance laws for behaviours are implied by world religions above the level of material genes. Scientists should be excited at that possibility but it ruins DNA inheritance laws. Religions inform that we feel dark spirit intimately not so much seeing them as prejudices they ask to feel to reject fair God. We are born as if to living spectacles helping focus on prejudice in our nature till death us do part. A fair trial on that may be necessary noting fair justice may itself be a spiritual inheritance law rights activists tap, see cover book 2. LGBT rights may tap it blindly at present.

What is Fair Science?

Fair science is based on deductive reason free from partiality. To start science by a fair definition lets to see modern science is not being fair and to uncover that its technicalities not absolutes to excuse it overriding fair truth in court. It reveals modern science has specialised for lawless hate crime to pervert justice, see book 1.

To confirm this more directly negligence law works as a foundation but science on that foundation is not modern science. Therefore modern science is fake or negligent pseudo-science courts screen by asking scientists for fair risk analyses for theories. It bars tacit contempt of court by framing false hypotheses technically.

The true science unfamiliar to most but I am preparing a report for courts. Negligence law foundations force to fair cosmology having Newton’s diligence on spirit forces from his last work 'General Scholium'. Centuries later we see natural science a trap of negligent rigour for spirited clinical insanity to pervert justice. It is unable to cope fairly with a spirited world so clinically insane. It works for blueprints for deity on a primeval hostage-contract to natural dark spirit 1 Kings 19, 11-13 and parasitic spirits to minds. It scoffs without fair risk analyses for error.

A risk analysis can take many forms. The form of a negligence-law exegesis lets prove natural science asks lawless hate crime to evolutionary anomaly of LGBT sex for rights working blind for the non-killer God, Wisdom 1, of court, Deu. 16, 20, and lifestyle contract Mic. 4, 5. By design fair trials in respect of negligence law let cut natural history to recognise fair God, 1 Cor. 1, 27-30, spirits fair LGBT chosen-people to open contract-path Jews began to call fair Messiah to divide by lifestyle contract. That path exists as faith-mandate fair God asks from the earth in Psalm 98 by advanced legal science not by natural science. The fair God makes religion a protected characteristic but ‘science’ & religious fraud to take rights not Mat. 7, 21-23. Hate crime taking the name of a fair God is widespread religious fraud in dark ages.

What is Fair Theology?

Fair theology is deductive science based on faith that Justice is impartial and not murderous …. as faith many in religion and ‘science’ fall short of.

Fair theology respects crown scriptures on fair practice like Leviticus 19, 15, Matthew 22, 16, James 2, 9-10 which leaves scriptures that lack fair sense to our minds a murderous riddle, Isaiah 1, 15-20.

Wherever a literal reading lacks fair sense, fair theology seeks a legal reading that is derived by respect for the fair or crown scriptures. A legal reading should clear all murderous paradoxes to prove faith in a fair God or fair Judgement Day. It sees religions as contractual forms with many legal parties including spirits to it. That such readings exist is fair indication God really exists. It clears Leviticus 20, 13 of suggesting a fair God hates gays. It also translates into simple fair questions in court making lightning progress possible.

It is not unusual to read scripture for murderous partiality to neighbour and to God, e.g. for terrorism. That is hate-crime of ‘the wicked’ in scripture who struggle to understand Justice. They drink to selfish readings that imply a charismatic murderous unfair deity or devil, Proverbs 8, 36 & 28, 5, Wisdom 1, 12-16 & 2, 21-24. It is their choice and a fair atonement for sin may cover even that grave ignorance of sin. Fair theology is thereby a call to repent as it removes right to use a fair atonement and plead ignorance in order to divide good from evil kingdoms. Superstitious fears stand in the way of fair theology.

In many respects selfish ‘science’ and tyrannical religion are natural allies. Neither is a legitimate fair cause but by fighting each other for power they may hide it even from courts.

Title Contest for Sex : The Trans Rights Case in Scripture

Basic to fair faith is a title-contest of good and evil supernatural powers to define ‘the Lord’ on earth. Fair theology only exists if a real devil exists for which there are formal fair proofs such as in book 1, p2. Is to feel prejudice against such reason with a fair Lord?

Fair theology puts life under jurisdiction laws of a deity it chooses in life-style choices. The decision may also be made above our heads as children even if we try to opt out. We can be claimed by more than one deity as a subject. The deity with best case may reinforce behaviour it wants subjects to feel natural even if sexual or to deny the deity exists. A deity can be an enchantment to romance selfish life or fair life.

A legal reading shows fair God not a killer as Wisdom 1 says. The reading is about giving up murder in Isaiah 1, 15-20. Sex rights may be path to the legal reading as follows.

Life has gender roles on earth. But scriptures suggest heaven is all male like God so there is no gender inequality. Scripture implies Jesus is for trans sex rights as Mary’s mum at Prov. 8, 22-36 then son at John 1 (principal boy) so Mary can trans to Jesus’ brother in heaven! (Vol 3, Just Proof of God). Fair God calls to those trans rights. But devil can murder trans or gay rights in his jurisdiction for idols as scripture records. Many read it that God murders by not looking for the legal reading. Devil can also ask selfish trans rights for idols in ways to discredit trans rights. Something significant is implied by trans rights movements.

God guides by Spirit directly and by legal finesse on punishments of the evil one to limit his testing curse on paths to God, Job 1, 12. Trans rights if witness to fair God of rights may win relief from the testing curse. To live outside the Spirit lives in punishing jurisdiction or care of gods who guide by darkness and curse. The curse is firstly for being a sinner against God but secondly for failing the god’s object of to sin well enough to depose God, i.e. for not sinning acutely enough to break God's plan to establish Justice Psalm 98. It is a double-tort in jurisdiction law basically as in the Lord’s prayer. To say the Lord's prayer gives fair Almighty a case we are on a path He can defend against bids of other gods to curse us to death.

A fair Almighty obliges evil gods to leave a loophole for sinners to repent and path towards God’s jurisdiction or heaven. The loophole has to reject murder and lie as the cardinal enemies of Justice. It requires to prove loyalty by finding a fair reading of God, Isaiah 1, 15-20. Evil gods shape the loophole around general sacrifice laws by which we ask protection from a deity. A fair God is against murderous sacrifice protection rackets but there is a narrow sacrificial loophole evidenced by a plan of prophesy in scripture. Understanding of Justice to it is prophesied in an end-time outpouring of the Spirit. The outpouring may be linked to LGBT life seeking fair right to exist in courts.

Sex is a vital force in a fair title-contest because it is for children to sacrifice to ‘the future’. Sex is for marriages to spiritual causes so may be hotly contested spiritually to make love sick. There is no higher loyalty to a cause than to offer or sacrifice children to it. Schools show the causes or deities people put faith in.

LGBT love does not have as many children to fulfil prophesies to defeat or feed evil. The devil may grudge it and murder it in jurisdiction of idols. But LGBT can help to raise other's children even to save their lives. For a fair gay is life that disproves we evolved by passing selfish genes on. That is unequivocal if LGBT life a path to fair reading of scripture to support the fair God. To stop that selfish ‘science’ and 'theology' deny a fair gay right to exist. They assert by prejudice that theology to relate LGBT life to the fair God does not exist. The world is then a stage for fair gays to prove they exist by finding fair theology to out fair God in court. Gay sex comes out as a cup to Justice against respectable yet perverted religion and ‘science’. It is a messianic role.

Starting from James 2, 9-10 who can read scripture to prove the Messiah is not LGBT and rest easy for Judgement Day? The following is a little depth on 1 Cor. 6 to show fair and prejudiced readings exist. Christians are asked to be fair judges fit to judge 'angels' at start of 1 Cor. 6. Only a few lines later it asks to define ’sexual immorality’ as if a fair judge of scripture Daniel 12, 9-10 without prejudice to violate James 2, 9-10. Fair judges will understand to define 'sexual immorality' unfairly is 'sexual immorality' as what it warns to avoid. Some say bias in translation on a rare word lets to target all gay sex when to be fair it targets only a subdivision of gay sex for idols. That also implies gay-sex-sheep attacked by gay-sex-goats and other goats to ruin their social bodies to block from coming out for fair God or Jesus. Thus LGBT rights are for good and evil as other groups. It makes it ‘Christian’ fraud to try to close the gay-sex-path to fair truth. A title-contest gives Christianity double-readings so 1 Cor. 6 a legal minefield for fair judges to chart. What fair judge defines ‘sexual morality’ for hate crime to LGBT life? What fair lay person failing to see the legal minefield exists uses verses by prejudice to oppress gay-sex-path?

To fight religious persecution the few verses used for gay bashing may be cleared in court to establish Christianity a fair rights religion for God! That the case fair God uses to limit devil's testing curse on LGBT life.

Meanwhile sex education perverts children if it asks them to get off on ‘respectable’ selfish ‘science’ or 'theology' working to pervert justice on earth! Where can children turn if courts do not protect them? Scripture implies the Messiah a gender bender. She would do anything legitimate for Father God to save her children, Mat. 23, 37, even change gender role to a male to lead to heaven, sleep with a prostitute as Hosea was asked, or take unjust punishment to Death in human form without sinning to destroy evil in court for God, Isaiah 53. Might She/He leave a spirited house for gay sex, 1 Cor. 8, 9, Mat. 18, 20, to help fight prejudice for this age? Book 1 suggests the fair reading of scripture does not rule out such a house. Can prejudice be sure it does not exist? But is the prejudice faith in a fair God?

To summarise, a fair gay hardly evolved to pass selfish genes on. LGBT life ask fair right to exist with courts. All fair life seeks a fair reading of scripture to prove fair life has right to exist. Progress in the fair reading may prove fair LGBT have a missionary role for God against prejudiced ‘science’ and religion seeking to pervert justice (and so pervert children). Fair LGBT then stand for using that reading to establish a fair God with courts despite religious persecution.

Fair God then calls fair LGBT to lead fair Jews, Hosea 11, 1-4, to the prophesied or promised land of fair theology or Justice. If such a reading exists fair life may use it to establish a fair God with courts Isaiah 61, 8-11. It also disproves theory of selfish natural selection or natural history in court since fair gay life is anomalous or does not fit as natural evolution. Natural selection may be a prejudiced theory genocidal to fair life, especially to fair Jews and fair LGBT life.

Fair Science and Court Accreditation of Scientists

The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST) is Parliament’s in-house source of scientific advice. POST is to bridge scientific law and the judiciary. POST has prepared this summary on court accreditation of scientists covering the Frye and Daubert tests used in the USA:

http://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/postpn248.pdf

This POST note may allow for justice to exist to serve science, or, for science to exist to serve justice. However, if a just God exists then only the latter is true and the former position is criminal. Thus, a test for the existence of God is to test the criminality of ‘science’ by expert help of courts.

Testing the criminality of ‘science’ is a duty of courts to protect the fair public from authoritarian claims on reality by ‘scientists’ of criminal prejudice. ‘Science’ can degenerate into organised crime to run environmental protection or eugenics movements. That test should then be part of court accreditation for scientists. It does not infringe freedom of faith. It allows religion with contempt for justice and fair theology to continue in such ‘faith’. However, fair theology works so well that it may be destined to bankrupt both selfish ‘science’ and tyrannical religions in court.

The theory of a just God implies that a ’science’ with crooked failings teaches a false cause and effect law. A false law is recognised by its support for unfair or selfish life like, say, evolutionary science does. Book 2 offers a fair map of the world of reason for graphic recognition of false or partial theories. Those theories may act as a cheat’s charter for mass delusion. To apply them cheats simply adopt selfish criteria of success for the theories that occult an overall criminal bent. Mathematical skills can be used like that. Cheats overegg value of their expert knowledge for authority over the public to take public funding for a criminal tyranny.

Courts are ideally on a war footing against accreditation of crooked scientists as life in a conspiracy to pervert course of justice. Until scholars can disprove fair justice as the one true foundation for science courts should assume that it is. How else can they uphold justice? A fair error estimate for a theory does then include its criminality or who, apart from fair courts or God, it sets out to cheat to survive.

Book 1 gives a concise argument for God by design to show that scientific and religious tyrannies share a common need to cheat, pervert or kill fair Jews or fair gays and fair judges. The latter are leading groups with a cultural interest in progress in fair reason to confront tyrannies in court. That implies that all tyrannies are associated with spiritual prejudices witnessed to in pertinent hate-crime or events like the holocaust. Tyrannical ‘sciences’ thus act as spiritual cult religions that cause social inequality and hate-crime. By contrast courts that swear in by God may aspire to be a spiritual force for fair justice. This fair theory entitles courts to insist that a fair treatment of spiritual forces is part of accreditation for scientists.

A simple question shows whether spiritual forces are relevant to accreditation of scientists. It is to ask if scientists bother with a fair case to deny spiritual forces exist else rely on cult dogma or political principles to deny it? Cults may be deaf to fair reason but if they seek public funds then the public are entitled to be warned of cult-criminality. That protects them from being deceived into thinking they fund true science when they actually fund technical cult-religion.

POST approach accreditation as for giving the right scientists an inside track with courts to establish a legitimate ‘science’ with society. This work helps courts to see that peer review under criminal law is all that is required of legitimate science same as for other professions. That supports fair rights against a would-be criminal master race as in WWII. Such a master race is tacit to the lawless creed of ‘survival of the fit’ for evolutionary and material genetic ‘science’. Do experts in material genetic law know the meaning of ‘fair’ to be able to select for ‘fair’ genes? If not then life is far more complex and spiritual than ‘science’ today allows for. It is hidden by a superstitious reverence for statistical clinical laws. Faith in those laws is partial and so sends spiritual attack on fair minds. Spiritual attack is felt by children in schools to make selective exams that invoke it unfair. Scientists have a duty to be fair on this issue to avoid being a cult-priesthood for brainwashing children.

Scientists today model for scientific tyrannies that shape ‘the system’ so everyone frames the right or ‘natural’ hypotheses or models. It is the fruit of a specialised selection process for scientific experts that lacks fair checks. The Nuremberg trial defence of obeying ‘the system’ is in practice how every selfish ‘science’ oppresses fair research. ‘The system’ is to defend reputation for good ‘science (propaganda) at expense of fair progress. Scientists who specialise to block fair research practice in their own backyards should not qualify for court accreditation. When work like this to indict tyrannical practice is easily denied a living then the whole establishment may be crooked or evil. For example their research councils may fund only evolutionary material models of origins for life where fair courts are given a back seat. However, scrupulous fair deductive science does yield competitive spiritual models for origins subject to fair courts as book 2 shows.

Fair scientists look to justice as an adversarial system giving voice to fair questions. Modern ‘science’ is in the trap of technical reason removed from fair principle which suits the great tyrannies of the age. If scientists wish to claim to be better than a cult then they should have rigorous definitions to set a line between science and religion that stands cross-examination in court. The author’s books began on technical reason to find there is no such line. The line relates to role of the observer in experimental ‘reality’ which book 2 covers. Without that line natural cause and effect law is cult dogma or delusion not true science.

The case given in book 1 to end natural history in court also ends ‘science’ based on a natural cause and effect law or on material genetic law. The crime-potential to natural cause and effect law is on the level of a black-hole for justice. Scientists for that may like to suggest either that their law is approximate in a benign way to fair science, or, the power that their ‘science’ promises or unleashes sets it above courts on earth. The former may be a perjurious claim and the latter a tyrannical ‘science’ for prosperity at expense of fair rights so of inequality or slavery for some groups.

These books establish fair science for courts to judge ‘science’ set in natural history. Meanwhile, natural ‘science’ is a disastrous not benign approximation to fair science. It is genocidal as WWII shows. A helpful picture deriving from Morris Kline in “Mathematics: the loss of certainty” likens modern scientists to spiders spinning webs in a castle dungeon. Many believe their webs are holding the castle up not holding life in the dungeon to die like flies. Meanwhile ‘scientists’ pose as good by helping social groups strategic to their aims for power. They help courts trap less fit crooks using gene ‘science’ but which may lead to a master race of tacit crooks if unchecked. WWII suggests ‘science’ with a genocidal cause is far more dangerous to civilisation, causing more murders, than mundane criminals. Some mundane criminals may be driven to crime partly as people deprived of a fair education or decent living by crooked scientists and scholars. Are mundane crooks necessarily worse sinners than some authorities of high reputation? The position of Jesus in Luke 23, 39-43 suggests not.

By asking the right fair questions it may be easy to trap as perjurious the scientists who base their research in natural history. If ‘natural’ scientists really support criminal law and fair research practice then why must they frame research in violation of those tenets? and what difference does fair research make to the cause and effect laws they frame? Such questions may follow the court-oath wherever they pose as fair witnesses. If they are not fair witnesses then they make false witnesses as in Exodus 20, 15 or false teachers of Christian prophesy. They must be anti-fair-religion that is based on Judaic-root scriptures or with the antichrist. If that is true for courts on earth then it will be true at the Judgement Day based on fair justice. All religions that support fair justice may fear that.

’God’s word’ is a leading data area for a just God as a testable theory. It claims to set God’s plan as a prophetic science that is legally coded under scrupulous fair Justice. ‘Science’ today is at sea with that as only marginally based on fair justice. It sets its path to the issue via problems to do with a technical foundation far removed from justice as detailed in book 2. Book 1 is a quick path to help courts see that any expert witness for ‘science’ set in natural history may be a few questions from trapped as perjurious in court. It applies for forensic scientists, physicists, doctors, psychiatrists, etc.. Their ‘science’ is delusional by the case to end natural history in book 1. The issue could also be raised in individual cases wherever expert ‘science’ testimony, e.g. fingerprint evidence, is involved. If the forensic expert is a bigger crook than those they finger then courts have a problem.

In summary, research to frame a universe where justice is marginal to ‘science’ should be suspected a conspiracy to pervert justice. It has fruited in scientific tyrannies genocidal to key fair cultures. Such ‘science’ is tacitly ant-Semitic if Judaism is the leading religion that claims Justice exists. The ‘science’ then has to be corrupting or genocidal to Jews to break prophesies of Jews returning to a fair God. That makes WWII evidence that a fair God exists opposed by ‘scientific’ evil. Evil is life that will try any ‘science’ and war to break God’s plan of prophesies on the due course of Justice to establish God’s right to rule openly on earth, Psalm 98. Evil religion can also share that aim by readings of God as an Almighty tyrant friend to ‘the righteous’. A fair universe or God allows life to choose between a tyrannical or fair kingdom.

The scientists fit to stand in a fair court are ones who put a fair foundation for science first. Newton may be such a scientist reluctant to frame hypotheses or falsify cases. His proof for God, rediscovered in book 2, shows modern ‘science’ has gone astray. Book 2 is about paths to uncover the reality to fair science.
RapidWeaver Icon

Made in RapidWeaver