Kline bewails in his book 'Mathematics The Loss of Certainty' p277 that Gödel's 1931 proofs imply truth is not in mathematics. Physicists use mathematics to model a cosmology of material forces ignoring spiritual forces. But that cherry-picks forces risking hate crimes! see area A of the back cover. It by no means proves a material reality sustains life on earth. Kline p337 sees that even Einstein has not a faintest idea of what electromagnetic waves we model are? There is no material explanation of them so they are spiritual in concept)

Nobel laureate John Bell frets in his book 'Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics' chapter 3 that in best theory, ‘elementary’ particles transcend space & time to set reality to us as if by ‘moral’ judgement. It does not fit with naive materialism and poses supernatural arbitration on our objects, e.g. by beat of a butterfly’s wings.

In 'The Just Proof of God' §1.10 etc. I see all models run by life of a modeller’s mind, if not God’s mind for origins of life, whose? This book rediscovers Newton’s proof for a deity by extrapolating from existing minds at §6.16 which fits within my comprehensive fair proof, §1.5. Newton’s proof helps cut expert scientific witness or science funding over cherry picking partiality to falsify a case for a natural world as p14 in this book tackles.

By fair court discipline, see area D back cover, science has a rights foundation to oppose scientific hate crime led by superstitious fear, pvi. Scientists can stare deep into an abyss of theory and pretend not to see it but is that not a contempt of court?

Theology for rights exists where to lie & die is a rights-bid of evil in a law-enacting title-contest for souls with a fair Almighty as Wis. 1, 13-16; 1 Cor. 15, 26, Luke 10, 18-21, John 10, 10 cover. A fair God lets life invent Death for theme-parks to play death-games, Prov. 8, 36, Mat. 5, 45, Jn 12, 25. Hell is thus a kingdom where dark forces of depression bar fair science. Its devil guides evolution of fledgeling-gods to rule ‘sin’ like him as God’s left-hand overlord, Gen. 3, 5, Job 1, 8-12, to the lesser gods of death for ‘sins’ that fail evil's causes. Thus a fair God gives evil right to define its own nature in law in its own kingdom. Evil eventually defines itself as life that will try anything to depose a fair God.

Once evil has defined itself it sees the legal grounds to demand a title contest outside hell to depose Justice or fair Spirit. Is God not faking perfect Justice as a tyrant? In that title-contest Justice to us might prove a fair Jewish spirit (Messiah?), or a fair gay spirit (Messiah?, p47), etc.. The evidence fair minds must prove loyalty to God on is a universal set of data that gives choice to vote for a partial or fair Lord, p19, Mark 12. We appear born to that title contest after WWII where gays now out in a rainbow-front to fight dark schools partial on the facts of gay life. Those angels back love for rights to open a path to God which ‘naughty-devil’ teachers feel far from 'respectable' showing their lack in fair mind . See the ‘bottom line for courts’ on the back cover.

A prime question of fair rights is whether a natural end to life is less likely for us than Judgement Day? See p14 for one way a fair court may verdict Judgement Day is more likely.