Moses leads all Judaic branch religions by asking fair trials as a general path to fair truth in Deuteronomy 16, 19-20:
Do not pervert justice or show partiality. .. Follow justice and justice alone, ...
The above exemplifies a crown verse of scripture to take precedence over how other verses are read if there is to be a fair Judgement Day, Psalm 98. It implies that to understand scripture fathoms a system of contractual justice under which it is given. That Justice is in account of all legal parties to mortal life so forgetting angels, demons and other spirits may exist risks losing sense of justice to it, Job 38, 4-7. This Volume reaches a starting point for fair trial or contractual theology at chapter 7, but chapter 1 heads towards it at section 1.2 with an introduction on contractual law to surface from chapter 7 onwards.
If Jews really stand for fair trials (I had a Jewish grandfather) then we see modern science is anti-Semitic as follows. Kosher science is not to cherry pick data in a field to falsify a theory, or, to cherry pick fields to falsify natural cosmology. To model a universe to omit Moses is false, anti-Semitic, provided a fair trial ruins it. Thus, to seek power for partial fallible scientific criteria, not by fair trials, risks a descent of man for a master race that wars to rid the world of fair Jews to survive, and cheat their path to truth. After WWII, Gentiles may owe Jews a fair trail on whether Jews bear witness to high legal science above life?
Moses heads a research path in prophesy to a promised land of fair theology for end times, Daniel 12, 9−10. It only outs by fair trial discipline around an atonement for sin, Isaiah 1, 15− 20 etc.. The object of the path is to offer a choice to divide life between genocidal cult tyrannies or the just reading of ‘God’s word’ fit for a fair court, Psalm 98, Isaiah 30, 10−13. Where has that path reached to today?
Jesus of course asks for a fair trial by Jews, Matthew 5, 17-20. Jesus guided Paul for 1 Cor. 6, 1−6 asking to define ‘sexual immorality’ fairly at 1 Cor. 6, 9. Humility and great care on that is needed when false teaching on sexual morality actually is sexual immorality. Sexual hate crime In 1 Cor. 6, turns a church into a sexually immoral body tested by ill health, Luke 5, 31, Psalm 32, 9. My book: ‘The Fair Rights Foundation to Science and Theology’ gifts a case to courts that God and Jesus back LGBT sex for rights. Thus a sexually immoral church opposes gay rights! Sex for rights is God’s object if our path to fair court readings Jews await, Isaiah 28, 11−13 & 29, 13− 24. Natural ‘science’ researches only natural paths risking tacit anti-Semitism and homophobia, see book cover.
Rights theology does not neglect spirits religions report if they exist as legal parties to our life and tribes, see back cover. By selfish nature we may fear a false ‘God’, James 2, 9−10. On deeper analysis, that devil tyrannises life by a global society of spirit forces to depress or corrupt dissent to death, Mark 14, 32-36. School children then face depression and some may find relief from suicidal feeling in an angelic house for LGBT rights, see cover. Which is better to serve the devil and die or spite the devil for gay rights? That love, not love of selfish ‘science’ / ‘theology’, may mandate the fair God at Psalm 98, Jer. 8, 9, 1 Cor. 1, 20, 2 Cor. 5, 10.
This is such a change in how the world is viewed that it likely must be for courts and fair trials to lead a battle to establish truth of this kind. But surely, everyone in a civilised society is entitled to be taught the reality a fair court or trial would back if free to judge?